Nem tudo que NÃO brilha, é colesterol.

Results— As assessed biochemically (milligrams per gram [mg/g]), echolucent plaques contained less hydroxyapatite (43.8 [SD 41.2] mg/g versus 121.6 [SD 106.2] mg/g; P=0.018), more total elastin (1.7 [SD 0.4] mg/g versus 1.2 [SD 0.4] mg/g; P=0.008), and more intermediate-size elastin forms (1.2 [SD 0.3] mg/g versus 0.8 [SD 0.4] mg/g; P=0.018). There was no difference in collagen amount between echogenic and echolucent plaques, neither biochemically (15.3 [SD 3.7] mg/g versus 14.4 [SD 3.4] mg/g) nor histologically (13.4 [SD 4.9] % versus 13.0 [SD 5.6] %). Cholesterol esters, unesterified cholesterol, and triglycerides were increased in plaques associated with symptoms (22.5 [SD 23.3] mg/g versus 13.3 [SD 3.2]; P=0.04), but no differences were detected between echolucent and echogenic plaques (13.5 [SD 4.0] versus 20.2 [SD 21.5] mg/g). Similar results were obtained by Oil Red O staining (symptomatic 7.6 [SD 4.7] % versus asymptomatic 4.2 [SD 3.6] %; P=0.03; echolucent 5.9 [SD 4.1] % versus echogenic 5.0 [SD 4.0] % of area).
.
Conclusions— Echogenicity of carotid plaques is mainly determined by their elastin and calcium but not collagen or lipid content. In addition, echolucency is associated to higher elastin content.
Stroke. 2004;35:2795
.
Pesquisa muito boa, mostrando que a ecolucência ( Escuro ao ultrassom) se relaciona mais a presença de elastina do que colesterol nas placas de carótida!
.
Então quando a placa parece escura após a capa fibrosa, não é possível afirmar que é lípide?
.
Isso muda muitos conceitos...
.